Skip to main content

Budd-Chiari Syndrome TIPS Prognostic Index Calculator

Budd-Chiari Syndrome TIPS Prognostic Index

Understanding the Budd-Chiari Syndrome TIPS Prognostic Index

The Budd-Chiari Syndrome TIPS Prognostic Index (BCS-TIPS) is a scoring system used to predict outcomes in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who undergo transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. This index helps clinicians assess prognosis and make informed treatment decisions.

What is Budd-Chiari Syndrome?

Budd-Chiari syndrome is a rare condition characterized by blood clots that block the hepatic veins that drain the liver. This blockage can lead to liver damage and various complications. TIPS is one of the treatment options available for managing this condition.

Components of the BCS-TIPS Score

The score is calculated using three parameters:

  1. Age
  2. Bilirubin level
  3. International Normalized Ratio (INR)

Clinical Significance

Score Interpretation

The BCS-TIPS prognostic index helps predict survival after TIPS placement:

  • The score is calculated as: Age (years) × 0.08 + Bilirubin (mg/dL) × 0.16 + INR × 0.63
  • A score > 7 indicates high risk of poor outcome within 1 year after TIPS
  • Scores < 7 are associated with good prognosis (96% survival at 1 year)
  • Overall 1-year and 5-year survival rates after TIPS are 88% and 78% respectively
  • Regular monitoring remains necessary after TIPS placement

When to Calculate BCS-TIPS

Calculate this index when:

  • Evaluating patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome
  • Considering TIPS placement
  • Monitoring disease progression
  • Assessing treatment outcomes

Clinical Applications

The Budd-Chiari Syndrome TIPS Prognostic Index is useful for:

  • Risk stratification
  • Treatment planning
  • Prognosis assessment
  • Patient counseling
  • Research purposes

Start calculating now to better understand your patient's prognosis!

References:

  1. Garcia-Pagán JC, et al. TIPS for Budd-Chiari syndrome: long-term results and prognostics factors in 124 patients. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(3):808-815.